Texas Senate Approves Bill Limiting How Students Learn About Historic Racism and Current Events

Pu Ying Huang for The Texas Tribune

Get essential education news and commentary delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up here for 成人抖阴鈥檚 daily newsletter.

After hours of passionate debate about how Texas teachers can instruct school children about America鈥檚 history of subjugating people of color, the state Senate early Saturday morning advanced a new version of a controversial bill aimed at banning critical race theory in public and open-enrollment charter schools.

Sen. , R-Mineola, introduced a reworked version of that also requires the State Board of Education to develop new state standards for civics education with a corresponding teacher training program to start in the 2022-23 school year. The Senate approved the bill in an 18-13 vote over opposition from educators, school advocacy groups and senators of color who worry it limits necessary conversation about the roles race and racism play in U.S. history.

The bill now heads back to the Texas House, which can either accept the Senate鈥檚 changes or call for a conference committee made up of members from both chambers to iron out their differences.

The Senate-approved version revives specific essential curriculum standards that students are required to understand, including the Declaration of Independence and the Federalist Papers. But it stripped more than two dozen requirements to study the writings or stories of multiple women and people of color that were also previously approved by the House, despite attempts by Democratic senators to reinstate some of those materials in the bill.

The Senate did vote to include the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1964, the 13th 14th and 19th amendments to the U.S. Constitution and the complexity of the relationship between Texas and Mexico to the list of required instruction.

Yet the most controversial aspects of the bill remain, including that teachers must explore current events from multiple positions without giving 鈥渄eference to any one perspective.鈥 It also bars students from getting course credit for civic engagement efforts, including lobbying for legislation or other types of political activism.

Educators, historians and school advocacy groups who fiercely oppose the bill remained unswayed by arguments that the bill is merely meant to ensure students are taught that one race or gender is not superior to another.

鈥淕iving equal weight to all sides concerning current events would mean that the El Paso terrorist ideology would have to be given equal weight to the idea that racism is wrong,鈥 said Trinidad Gonzales, a history professor and assistant chair of the dual enrollment program at South Texas College. 鈥淭hat is the problem, white supremacy would be ignored or given deference if addressed. That is the problem with the bill.鈥

Hughes denied that the bill would require teachers give moral equivalency to perpetrators of horrific violence.

Sen. , R-Conroe, who sponsored the Senate version of the bill, said in a statement to the Tribune that Texas schools should emphasize 鈥渢raditional history, focusing on the ideas that make our country great and the story of how our country has risen to meet those ideals.鈥

But Sen. , D-Dallas, raised concerns on the Senate floor that the historical documents required in the bill only reflect the priorities of white senators.

鈥淭here were documents that were chosen, not by Hispanics, not by African Americans in this body, but by Anglos,鈥 he said. 鈥淣o input from us in terms of what founding documents should in fact be considered by all children in this state.鈥

Hughes also told members there have been instances in various school districts where parents have raised concerns about lessons where students have been taught one race is inherently superior to another. He pointed to a particular instance in Highland Park Independent School District where parents were concerned about a book called Not My Idea: A Book About Whiteness.

鈥淲e do have teaching now that we want to get out that one race or sex is inherently superior to another, or the individual by virtue of the individual’s race or sex is inherently racist, sexist or oppressive, whether consciously or unconsciously,鈥 Hughes said. 鈥淚 think we agree we don’t want that taught in schools. That鈥檚 why we need this bill.鈥

But Sen. , D-Houston, pushed back against that premise, reading a passage from the book鈥檚 author about its intent to help children dismantle white supremacy.

“My point is that we cannot just pick and choose what we are going to teach as history and expect to change things and make things better,鈥 Miles said. 鈥淚t doesn鈥檛 work that way. This bill is eliminating and excluding some things, and including what you want to say.”

Educators also worry the legislation will change how teachers can engage students in hard, but important, conversations about American current events that teachers often use to trace back to historical events.

鈥淜ids get engaged and kids want to dig into your class when they get the relevance and they have some buy-in,鈥 said Jocelyn Foshay, a Dallas Independent School District middle school teacher.

The bill, which mirrors legislation making its way through state legislatures across the country, has been coined the Critical Race Theory bill, though neither the House or Senate versions explicitly mention the academic discipline, which studies the way race and racism has impacted America鈥檚 legal and social systems.

The latest version of the bill also reintroduced an explicit ban of the teaching of The New York Times鈥 , which examines U.S. history from the date when enslaved people first arrived on American soil, marking that year as the country鈥檚 foundational date. That 2019 work from journalist Nikole Hannah-Jones won the Pulitzer Prize and was recently thrust back into the national spotlight after the University of North Carolina after conserative criticism of her work.

鈥淭o suggest that America is so racist at its core to be irredeemable and to suggest that people based on the color of their skin can never overcome biases and can never treat each other fairly, that鈥檚 a real problem,鈥 Hughes said of the project.

Educators also worry the bill language is too vague and will allow students and parents to potentially use the legislation against them if they disagree with how they鈥檙e teaching history curriculum, regardless of the primary sources and historical texts teachers use to back up their lessons. It鈥檚 also unclear who would enforce these requirements and how schools or districts would handle these issues.

鈥淚t makes it so open for anyone to interpret it the way they want to interpret it,鈥 said Juan Carmona, a history teacher in the Rio Grande Valley town of Donna.

He sees this bill as a pushback to including more historical voices and perspectives in the teaching of history. In recent years, Texas started to offer Mexican American and African American studies courses to all high school students.

Over the past year, the phrase 鈥渃ritical race theory鈥 has turned into a Republican rallying cry in an apparent pushback against increased conversations about diversity and inclusion and unpacking implicit bias.

This week, 20 state attorneys general to U.S. Education Secretary Miguel Cardona and expressed concern with critical race theory and, specifically, the 1619 Project. The letter says critical race theory analyzes history through 鈥渢he narrow prism of race.鈥

Georgina Perez, who serves on the State Board of Education, slammed the bill and its supporters, saying they are using buzzwords for political gain rather than to improve education.

鈥淭hey have no idea what critical race theory is, what it does, who the founders are. They’ve never read a book, much less a paragraph on it,鈥 said Perez. 鈥淚 understand that maybe some white people are uncomfortable. Well, dammit, when Black people were being lynched, they sure as hell weren’t comfortable. Native Americans being removed from their land and Mexican Americans being shot to death in the middle of the night, that shit wasn’t comfortable either.鈥

Erin Douglas contributed to this story.聽

Kate McGee is a higher education reporter at The Texas Tribune, the only member-supported, digital-first, nonpartisan media organization that informs Texans about public policy, politics, government and statewide issues.

Disclosure: New York Times has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan news organization that is funded in part by donations from members, foundations and corporate sponsors. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism. Find a complete .

Get stories like these delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for 成人抖阴 Newsletter

Republish This Article

We want our stories to be shared as widely as possible 鈥 for free.

Please view 成人抖阴's republishing terms.

On 成人抖阴 Today